Bridging Disciplines: A Systematic Review of Interdisciplinary Studies in Library and Information Science

Abstract

Statement of the Problem. Interdisciplinary collaboration has become increasingly central to Library and Information Science (LIS) as the field confronts complex, multi-dimensional problems. This study assesses the status of interdisciplinary LIS research, examining annual publication trends, leading sources, research design, and contributing disciplines, and identifies the barriers and challenges that impede such collaboration.

Methods. A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of 147 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2013 and 2023 was undertaken.

Results. Findings show a clear upward trajectory in interdisciplinary output, with peaks in 2021 and in 2023. Computer science and education emerge as the most active contributing disciplines, evidencing the reliance of LIS on technological innovation and pedagogical theory. The Journal of Documentation is the leading publication venue, underscoring its role as a primary outlet for cross-disciplinary scholarship within LIS. Methodologically, studies rely predominantly on qualitative and quantitative designs, while mixed-methods remain comparatively underutilized. Six recurrent impediments to interdisciplinary research were uncovered: conceptual misalignment among collaborative fields; institutional and structural barriers that limit support and incentives; gaps in cross-disciplinary skills and knowledge; communication and terminology differences that hamper mutual understanding; obstacles in publishing and peer review; and time and resource constraints linked to extended coordination and limited infrastructure.

Originality. This research contributes a comprehensive, decadal synthesis of the LIS interdisciplinary landscape, bridging the gap between theoretical necessity and practical execution. The findings mirror broader interdisciplinary literature and highlight the need for policy reforms, targeted professional development, and more inclusive publishing models to advance integrative scholarship. Future work should include scoping reviews, network and text-mining analyses, and the development of metrics that capture the societal impact of interdisciplinary LIS research.